Difference between revisions of "Talk:Poison Pen"

From ZineWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: I noticed that InvisibleFriend removed the reviews that had been included in this entry. I don't know, I was kind of thinking I liked having one or two reviews on there. It might be a good...)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I noticed that InvisibleFriend removed the reviews that had been included in this entry. I don't know, I was kind of thinking I liked having one or two reviews on there. It might be a good model for including info like abstracts or library holdings. Then again, it might be clutter. Anyone else have thoughts on this? [[User:Jerianne|Jerianne]] 13:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 
I noticed that InvisibleFriend removed the reviews that had been included in this entry. I don't know, I was kind of thinking I liked having one or two reviews on there. It might be a good model for including info like abstracts or library holdings. Then again, it might be clutter. Anyone else have thoughts on this? [[User:Jerianne|Jerianne]] 13:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
:I'm not opposed to posting reviews as long as it doesn't make the article look like an ad. Maybe quoting a review in the description works better than listing a couple of full reviews. [[User:Dan10things|dan10things]] 00:21, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:21, 15 August 2009

I noticed that InvisibleFriend removed the reviews that had been included in this entry. I don't know, I was kind of thinking I liked having one or two reviews on there. It might be a good model for including info like abstracts or library holdings. Then again, it might be clutter. Anyone else have thoughts on this? Jerianne 13:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm not opposed to posting reviews as long as it doesn't make the article look like an ad. Maybe quoting a review in the description works better than listing a couple of full reviews. dan10things 00:21, 15 August 2009 (UTC)